Link mention

• ThreadsDanila Sentyabov (@dsent) • Threads, Say more (primarily English content)

• Main blog: FacebookDanila Sentyabov (mostly in Russian)

• AI & Tech channel: Цифровая г̶и̶Гиена (almost exclusively in Russian, but auto-translate is available)

Sources

The Good

• WikipediaLK-99 — a compound claimed to be a room-temperature superconductor in 2023

The Bad

• PubMed Central (PMC)How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases — the story of aerosol/droplet confusion

• gwern.netDoes Mouse Utopia Exist?

• Slate Star CodexAgainst Rat Park

• 🔗www.letexier.org — Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment

• FrontiersFrontiers | A Statistical Explanation of the Dunning–Kruger Effect

• PubMed Central (PMC)Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Between Early Delay of Gratification and Later Outcomes

• plosoneBehavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? — on social priming effect (or lack thereof)

• 🔗faculty.haas.berkeley.edu — Assessing the Robustness of Power Posing: No Effect on Hormones and Risk Tolerance in a Large Sample of Men and Women

• https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691616652873 — A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

• https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2515245918810225 — Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (replication of 28 widely cited experiments in psychology)

The [Ugly] Metascience

• WikipediaReplication crisis — Wikipedia doesn’t count as a reliable source, but it gives a good overview of the problem, and you can scroll to the sources section to read the publications that do count.

• plosmedicineWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False — the 2005 study by John P. A. Ioannidis that started it all

• 🔗www.nature.com — this manifesto from 2017 proposes a path out of the dark place we’re in.

• ScienceEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science

• 🔗PNASThe entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly | PNAS — a study of the industrial-scale fraud circles in science

Demo:

Ход шутом: жизнь с СДВГ (a regular link)